The short-termism

Hamster Wheel

The more

the better?

Researchers face increasing pressure to produce results in ever shorter timeframes, with negative consequences. For example, quality is affected by errors, fraud, and a lack of reproducibility. Shorter funding cycles may lead to less research in unexplored areas. Another effect, ironically, is that most scientists don't have the time to follow what is being published because they are too busy publishing and researching. As a result, how are they supposed to work productively? It’s like running on a hamster wheel. Shouldn't we stop for a moment and think about how this could be done better?     

  • 73%

    say that pressure to produce results or publish papers has increased over the past 10 years 

  • 59%

    say too much low-quality research is published. This may be linked to increasing pressure to publish

  • 74%

    say that shorter funding cycles leads to less research in new, unexplored areas

    graphical view of a small microscope under a microscope
    Do we need

    research on scientific research?

    What's the current state of scientific research productivity? What questions need to be asked to ensure such research is more productive in the future? We’ve conducted a study to explore which levers need to be pulled to increase productivity.

    Download Whitepaper
    Join the

    conversation

    What are your thoughts on the current state of productivity in scientific research? Do you have ideas on how scientific research can be more productive? Join the discussion in our LinkedIn group or participate in one of our other social media channels using the hashtag #productivescience

    The other Key Findings

    • The Dilemma Of Public Funding Balance

      Most respondents are fairly satisfied with how public funding is prioritized. But its share in R&D budgets has declined. This could be bad for long-term research which drives innovation. How can it be balanced?

      Learn More

    • The Collaboration Paradox

      Internal collaboration drives research productivity, half our survey respondents claim. But large teams are seen as a significant barrier to research productivity. How can we ensure productive collaboration?

      Learn More

    • The Complexity Trap

      These days, research requires larger teams with greater individual specialization. But larger teams are harder to manage. This may negatively impact productivity. What’s the solution?

      Learn More

      Furthering human progress.

      • AI IN DRUG DISCOVERY

        We shape the future of healthcare. For example, by utilizing artificial intelligence to find new and more effective treatments for diseases, faster.
        Read more

      • DIRECTED SELF-ASSEMBLY

        We shape the digital world of tomorrow. For example, by utilizing a revolutionary new way of building microchips and by collaborating with partners on quantum-computing.
        Read more

      • CULTURED MEAT

        We help to save the planet. For example, with cultured meat. This could be an alternative to regular meat that will change our current resource-intensive farming methods.
        Read more

      • SELF DRIVING CARS

        We build a smarter, more connected world. For example, by using high-tech materials for the creation of powerful microchips essential for the self-driving cars of the future.
        Read more
      a graphic of a smiling heart
      Let’s keep the heart

      OF HUMAN PROGRESS BEATING

      Societal and economic developments are changing our lives. Our constant curiosity and passion for science and technology enable human progress. Are you curious about our mission and our study on scientific research productivity? If so, tap here.

      click here